New York Attorney General Letitia James announced Monday that she would step into a legal battle over Texas’ ban on abortion pills. The case is the latest in a growing national divide between states that restrict abortion and those that protect providers who help out-of-state patients.
Background of the CaseThe legal fight began in December 2024, when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton sued Dr. Margaret Carpenter, co-founder of the Abortion Coalition for Telemedicine, alleging she violated Texas law when she mailed abortion pills to a woman there. A Collin County, Texas, judge later ordered Carpenter to stop providing abortion medications to Texas residents and imposed more than $113,000 in penalties.
Download the SAN app today to stay up-to-date with Unbiased. Straight Facts™.
Point phone camera here
In New York, Acting Ulster County Clerk Taylor Bruck responded by refusing to file the judgment in March and again in July, citing the state’s shield law.
These laws, which exist in over 20 states, are designed to protect health care providers from legal action in states where abortion is restricted.
In a statement, James said she is stepping in to defend New York’s laws and courts. She described Texas’ actions as “blatant overreach” and said the state has “no authority in New York.”
Texas Argues Constitutional ViolationPaxton has argued that New York’s shield law violates the U.S. Constitution’s full faith and credit clause, which requires states to recognize each other’s court rulings. He called James a “lawless abortionist” on X and said he intends to challenge her intervention in court.
Letitia James is a lawless abortionist who is obsessed with killing babies and weaponizing her office for her political career.
I will defeat her in court. https://t.co/z5PWG3IWL1
— Attorney General Ken Paxton (@KenPaxtonTX) September 8, 2025 New York’s ResponseJames said she will submit a legal filing later this month, asserting that New York has the authority to protect its residents and judicial system from out-of-state interference.
She emphasized that the state’s shield law is intended to safeguard health care providers and uphold residents’ rights.
Start your day with fact-based news.Learn more about our emails. Unsubscribe Anytime.
Daily Newsletter
National ImplicationsIn July, Paxton joined more than a dozen attorneys general from Republican-led states in urging Congress to take action against abortion shield laws. At the same time, the Texas Legislature advanced a bill allowing private citizens to sue anyone who distributes abortion drugs to or from the state. Gov. Greg Abbott has yet to sign the measure that was passed in the latest special session.
Some legal experts told the Texas Tribune the dispute could eventually reach the U.S. Supreme Court, highlighting ongoing conflicts between states over abortion since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.