赛派号

奢侈品彩妆品牌销量排行 Delay in filing appeal condoned as plausible and sufficient cause shown

Puttaraju Hemathi Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

ITAT Bangalore held that delay in filing of appeal due to non-registration on Income Tax portal and non-receipt of notices are plausible and sufficient cause show. Accordingly, delay condoned and appeal restored back for fresh consideration.

Facts- AO concluded the reassessment proceedings by adding entire sale consideration of Rs. 55,80,000/- as short term capital gain. CIT(A)/NFAC dismissed the appeal of the assessee by not condoning the delay of 147 days and did not admit the appeal for adjudication, as it is a

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

版权声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献,该文观点仅代表作者本人。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌抄袭侵权/违法违规的内容, 请发送邮件至lsinopec@gmail.com举报,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。

上一篇 没有了

下一篇没有了